Legal Opinion

In Re Goldberg

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 4, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Application is now made to fix fees for Louis B. LeDuc, solicitor for and of counsel with petitioner, and for Messrs. Alvord Alvord, solicitors for and of counsel with the alleged lunatic. In addition to the counsel mentioned, Messrs. Frank Kotok and Raymond Saltzman pray for counsel fees as being also of counsel with petitioner, and Messrs. Leroy Loder and Solve Tuso for services as counsel also for the alleged lunatic.

There can be no duplication of counsel fees based upon the number of counsel employed by a receiver. Conover v. WestJersey Mortgage Co., 96 N.J. Eq. 441. In that case legal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. GreenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Conover v. West Jersey Mortgage Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. In Re RhodesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. In Re Judges in ChanceryNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. United States Trust Co. N.Y. v. SpeirNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. In Re LandryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API