Legal Opinion

In Re Rhodes

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 16, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mrs. Woods having filed a petition for a commission in the nature of a writ de lunatico inquirendo concerning her mother, Mary Rhodes, a commission was issued in the usual form to three commissioners named therein, who by proper precept required the sheriff of Atlantic county to summon twelve jurors to inquire into the lunacy of Mary Rhodes, the subject of the inquisition. The jury disagreed, nine jurors agreeing upon a verdict of lunacy, and three refusing to sign the verdict. In this posture I directed the issuance of a alias commission, and in order the better to have a finding by a jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Groel v. United Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  2. In re PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Galbreath v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. In re FrankishNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
  5. Shreve v. HarveyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. East Paterson v. KarkusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. In Re DegnanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  3. In Re RiesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. In Re OswaldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. In Re TierneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API