Legal Opinion

Pipkin v. National Loan & Investment Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the St. Francois Circuit Court. — Hon. James D. Fox, Judge. The counter propositions of respondent to the third assignment of error by appellant is, that the trial court had jurisdiction of the appellant loan and investment association, and that its judgment is valid. R. S. 1889, secs. 2526, 2527, 2528 and 2529; Mikel v. Railway, 54 Mo. 145; Rippstein v. Ins. Co., 57 Mo. 86; Roberts v. Ins. Co., 26 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the St. Francois Circuit Court. — Hon. James D. Fox, Judge. The counter propositions of respondent to the third assignment of error by appellant is, that the trial court had jurisdiction of the appellant loan and investment association, and that its judgment is valid. R. S. 1889, secs. 2526, 2527, 2528 and 2529; Mikel v. Railway, 54 Mo. 145; Rippstein v. Ins. Co., 57 Mo. 86; Roberts v. Ins. Co., 26 Mo. App. 94; Hoen v. Railway, 64 Mo. 563. The objection to respondent’s petition, not having been made by demurrer or answer in the lower court,can now be sustained only on the ground…

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

The amended petition alleged in substance that the defendant is a corporation, incorporated under the provisions of article 9, chapter 42, Revised Statutes 1889; that its chief and home office is located in the city of Springfield, in Greene county, Missouri; that it has no office, agent or officer in the county of St.. Francois, *4where or upon whom service of process of any kind can be had, and that this fact was so adjudged by the circuit court of St. Francois county, on May 29,1897,uponmotion of plaintiff and testimony introduced in support thereof, as is evidenced by a record entry to that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Mansur v. BottsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. McDermott v. ClaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Mikel v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blair v. PatersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. McKinstry v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Cornett v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Excelsior Manufacturing Co. v. Assigned EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API