Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Nestorovski Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 2009No. Docket 271704Published

1DissentSaad, C.J.

i. introduction

The precise issue litigated in In re Meredith Estate, 275 Mich 278; 266 NW 351 (1936) is the arbitrability of testamentary capacity; the Michigan Supreme Court in Meredith concluded that testamentary capacity is not arbitrable. In all material respects, an identical issue is presented to the Court, because we are asked to decide whether the parties’ agreement to arbitrate Vlado Nestorovski’s testamentary capacity is enforceable. Because we are bound by the principle of stare decisis embodied both in our jurisprudential history and in specific holdings from our highest court,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API