Legal Opinion

Blue Cross of California v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1998No. B122446PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. Introduction

This original writ proceeding presents a question of first impression: whether a California court can, as authorized by state law, order classwide arbitration in a case that falls under the Federal Arbitration Act (the act). (9 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.) Stated differently, the issue is whether the act preempts California decisional authority authorizing classwide arbitration. The United States Supreme Court has never reached the question whether the act precludes classwide arbitration under state law. We conclude application of the California classwide…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API