Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Stalmann

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided August 1, 1904No. 779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to Remand.

1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge

(orally). Plaintiffs move this court to remand this case to the state court upon the ground that this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause, in that it is not alleged by the petition for removal, nor does it appear by the record or otherwise, that at the time of the commencement of the action in the state court there was diverse citizenship of the parties. It is not al*810leged by the said petition, nor does it appear in any manner by the record, that at the time of the commencement of the suit the defendants were residents and citizens of the state of Utah, or any other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Cameron v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kyle v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1909
  2. Holton v. Helvetia-Swiss Fire Ins. Co. of St. GallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1908
  3. Thompson v. StalmannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API