Legal Opinion
United States v. Frantz
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 2, 1955No. Nos. 11331, 11341PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
These are two appeals from summary judgment for the United States in its suit under the Renegotiation Act1 to recover excessive profits found by the Under Secretary of War to have been realized by appellant partnership on certain war contracts.2 Appellants contend that the District Court erred in holding that, except for timely appeal to the Tax Court as authorized by statute but not taken here, the Under Secretary’s determination was not subject to judicial reexamination. Appellant partner H. P. Frantz advances the additional contention, based on the Soldiers’ and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mulhearn v. Federal Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Polis v. CreedonEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baughman v. Bradford Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Baughman v. Bradford Coal Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Johnson v. KolmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Johnson v. KolmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. William H. Frantz, H. P. Frantz, J. J. McDevitt Individually and as Co-Partners Doing Business as Frantz Equipment Company, a Co-Partnership, William H. Frantz and J. J. McDevitt United States of America v. William H. Frantz, H. P. Frantz, J. J. McDevitt Individually and as Co-Partners Doing Business as Frantz Equipment Company, a Co-Partnership, H. P. FrantzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955