Legal Opinion

Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Dean

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1932No. 5842PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge. ‘

This suit was brought by appellant to recover income and profits taxes for the year 1918 assessed against and paid by it. Appellant claimed that the assessment and collection were barred by the statute of limitations. The case was heard by the judge without a jury. At the close of the evidence each party moved for judgment. Appellant's motion was denied, and that of appellee was granted. Appellant excepted and filed its bill of exceptions. There were no requests for special findings of fact or conclusions of law and the findings were general. Nothing was preserved for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Greer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Liberty Baking Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  3. Stern Bros. & Co. v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. New York Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. Independent I. & C. Storage Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Crown Willamette Paper Co. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  5. Wausau Sulphate Fibre Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API