Legal Opinion

Stern Bros. & Co. v. Burnet

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1931No. 9046PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals affirming á deficiency redetermination of taxes of the petitioner. There is no dispute that the amount of taxes claimed by the Government is proper. The only controversy is whether the assessment and collection of this deficiency is barred by limitations. It is conceded that it is so barred unless extended by two waivers. Therefore the real issues are as to the term of extension by these two waivers and as to the validity and binding effect of the waivers themselves.

Petitioner contends that the waivers…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Aiken v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Greylock Mills v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Woods v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  2. Adler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Jack M. Lesser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Hoffman v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  5. Central Paper Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API