Legal Opinion

De Ville v. Continental Assurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 27, 1960PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bastow, J. P.

Both parties to this action concede that there exists no triable issue but each demands summary judgment. The facts are simple. Plaintiff’s intestate (hereinafter the “ insured ”) was a member of a carpenters’ union from 1957 to 1959. On June 1, 1957 he became insured and was issued a certificate under a group plan entered into between defendant and the trustees of Mohawk Valley District Council Carpenters Welfare Fund.

The insured died on May 14, 1959. It is alleged in the amended answer and here accepted by plaintiff that the eligibility of insured for coverage under the group…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thull v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Magee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Missouri State Life Ins. v. HinkleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  5. Chrosniak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Landorf v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Wells v. Wilbur B. Driver Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Reger v. National Ass'n of Bedding Manufacturers Group Insurance Trust FundNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Landorf v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Oakley v. National Western Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API