Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 24, 1999No. 97-1391PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

This case involves a dispute between a decedent’s widow and ex-wife over the proceeds of the decedent’s retirement account. The trial court found no basis to void the decedent’s designation of his former spouse as the beneficiary of this account, nor do we. Therefore, we affirm.

I. The facts of this case are undisputed. The decedent, Daniel Schultz, and the appel-lee, Paula Schultz, were married in 1970. In 1983, Daniel listed Paula as the beneficiary on his individual retirement account (IRA). Subsequently, in 1988, the couple’s marriage was dissolved. In the dissolution…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hyler v. GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. In Re Roberts'estateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Lynch v. BogenriefSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Bersch v. VanKleeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PaineWebber Inc. v. EastCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Pinkard v. Confederation Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sadler v. BuskirkKentucky Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API