Legal Opinion

Richardson v. ZONING COM'N OF REDDING

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 15, 2008No. AC 28364PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The defendants Candace R. Benyei and C. Christian Benyei 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiffs, John P. Richardson and Laurie G. Richardson, from the decision of the zoning commission of the town of Redding (commission) approving the defendants’ application to construct an indoor riding arena on their property located at 29 Giles Hill Road in Redding. On appeal, the defendants claim (1) that the court improperly applied the successive application rule when it determined that the commission could not approve a second, revised…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Hoffman v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Wood v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Northeast Parking, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Trumbull Falls, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayes Family Ltd. P'ship v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Hayes Family Ltd. Partnership v. GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Turek v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API