Legal Opinion
United States v. Linwood Douglas Thorne
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1998No. 95-5568PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge WILKINS joined.
OPINION
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
Linwood Douglas Thorne, who pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, raises several issues on direct appeal. We find merit in Thorne’s first argument — that the trial court failed to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by neglecting to inform Thorne of the maximum sentence to which he was subject under the terms of his plea agreement — and therefore need not address his other claims. We vacate Thorne’s guilty…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Terry Russell GoinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Gyan Parkash SyalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William A. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Joe Allen BoundsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Tony GoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Gerson Aplicano-OyuelaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. HairstonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. FeurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Darrius KingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. James BryantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.