Legal Opinion
Matts v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 14, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of plaintiffs’ case.
Plaintiffs/appellants Pennie J. Matts and Dale C. Burlingham filed a complaint in Maricopa County Superior Court against the City of Phoenix and others to recover damages for bodily injuries and property damage sustained when Burlingham drove his car into a deep hole on the right shoulder of 38th Avenue near the intersection of 38th Avenue and Missouri Avenue. 1 Appellants alleged that the city was negligent in failing to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- County of Harris v. EatonTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Wisener v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Taylor v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Davis v. WeberArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Bailey v. Montgomery Ward and CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Acuna v. KroackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Hudgins v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Cooley v. Arizona Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Acuna v. Hampton And KroackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.