Legal Opinion

Regier v. Hutchins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1956No. 37023PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

In the trial court, the defendants in error herein were the plaintiffs, and plaintiff in error was the defendant. They will hereinafter be referred to by those appellations. The controversy between them involves injuries allegedly .inflicted in 1953 by flood-waters of the Washita River, upon a cotton crop. The cotton was growing upon approximately 50 acres of- a 240-acre farm owned by the plaintiff Jamie C. Hutchins, and, upon which, she and her husband, the other plaintiff, Joe Hutchins, reside. Downstream from where the river traverses this farm there was originally a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Hudson v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SicklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Midwestern Engine and Equipment Co. v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Barbe v. BarbeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Sattler v. Coulter ex rel. CoulterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Mari Davies, V. Multicare Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Jade Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API