Frederick v. Federal-Mogul Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition to defendant. We affirm.
i
Plaintiff, a tool and die maker employed by defendant, asserted in his complaint that in November 2000 he “conceptualized and invented a new machine and process for the manufacturing of engine bearings,” 1 which he disclosed to defendant after defendant promised to keep the invention confidential and to fairly compensate plaintiff if defendant used it. In October 2001, defendant filed for bankruptcy. In March 2003, defendant, allegedly without plaintiffs consent, began using the new method at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Robert Burns Jensen Rosemary Tooker Jensen, Debtors. California Department of Health Services v. Robert Burns Jensen Rosemary Tooker JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- In Re: Manville Forest Products Corporation, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re: Cool Fuel,incorporated,debtor. Cool Fuel, Incorporated, a California Corporation v. Board of Equalization of the State of California,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Talmer Bank & Trust v. ParikhMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- City of Southfield v. Shefa LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
- People v. VanceMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Premiere Property Services Inc v. Matthew CraterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020