Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Logsdon

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1986No. 15983PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Senior Justice.

Plaintiffs Louie and Collette Martinez brought suit for specific performance of a real estate contract or, alternatively, for damages. Defendant Tom Logsdon counterclaimed for possession of the real estate and damages. The trial court entered an order granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs, including special damages for attorney fees. Defendant files this appeal raising three issues: (1) whether plaintiffs state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted; (2) whether the trial court could properly grant summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs when…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Southern Union Gas Co. v. Briner Rust Proofing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bishop v. BeecherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Eiferle v. ToppinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nearburg v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MooreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cagan v. Village of Angel FireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Cortez v. CortezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. United Nuclear Corp. v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API