Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richardson v. McCracken Enterprises

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1997No. COA96-1236Published

1Dissent

Judge Wynn

dissenting.

In my opinion, the language of N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 41(a)(1) is clear. Therefore, we need not interpret this statute to give effect to the legislative intent. The two-dismissal rule under Rule 41(a)(1) provides in pertinent part that “a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed ... an action based on or including the same claim.” (emphasis added). Without any notion of ambiguity, the statute addresses the dismissal of the same claim, not transaction.

In this case, the plaintiffs brought an action in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poore v. Swan Quarter Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Kuhn v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API