Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1986No. F004269PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, Acting P. J.

Statement of the Case

Appellant was charged in two separate cases by amended informations with burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), 1 receiving stolen property (§ 496) and possession of a controlled substance (heroin) (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350). Prior felony convictions of attempted theft of an automobile (Veh. Code, § 10851), robbery (§ 211), burglary (§ 459) and twice receiving stolen property (§ 496) were alleged for enhancement purposes. The cases were subsequently consolidated.

Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charges and successfully moved for a bifurcated trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. CadoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. TessmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API