Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schwarz v. General Aniline & Film Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1953Published

1DissentFuld, J.

I.cannot agree that the lone circumstance that petitioner’s legal expenses were incurred in defending a criminal, rather than a civil, antitrust proceeding removes his claim from the compass of section 64 of the General Corporation Law. Both the language and the design of that statute point the conclusion — apparently adopted by all the judges who passed upon the case below •— that that factor does not, in and of itself, constitute a bar to reimbursement.

Nor do I believe that such recompense is proscribed on the further ground — not considered by the court (opinion of Desmond, J., pp.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fasulo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
  4. People v. DaibochNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Kavanaugh v. . Commonwealth Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API