Schwarz v. General Aniline & Film Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentFuld, J.
I.cannot agree that the lone circumstance that petitioner’s legal expenses were incurred in defending a criminal, rather than a civil, antitrust proceeding removes his claim from the compass of section 64 of the General Corporation Law. Both the language and the design of that statute point the conclusion — apparently adopted by all the judges who passed upon the case below •— that that factor does not, in and of itself, constitute a bar to reimbursement.
Nor do I believe that such recompense is proscribed on the further ground — not considered by the court (opinion of Desmond, J., pp.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fasulo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
- People v. DaibochNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kavanaugh v. . Commonwealth Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.