Legal Opinion
Poppenhusen v. Poppenhusen
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Ac tío tr for dower.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
This action is hy the widow of Herman C. Poppenhusen (who died March 1, 1891) for her dower in a lot of land on the northerly side of Bradford avenue, Flushing— now the third ward of the borough of Queens. Title to Herman 0. Poppenhusen is claimed by a conveyance from Orange Judd and wife, dated May 1, 1869, and recorded on July 1, 1869.
About 1870 the lot was built upon as' part of a railroad station hy the corporate predecessor of the defendant the Long Island Railroad Company, and has since been occupied as the Flushing station.
There are here concerned two railroad companies, namely, “The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carr v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Garfield v. . HatmakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Barnes v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Robbins v. . RobbinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Gage v. GageNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gallagher v. PerotNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- In re the Accounting of SchwarzkopfNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957