Legal Opinion
Lyon v. Holton
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
The motion is for summary judgment in favor of defendants in a stockholders’ action based upon defenses supported by documentary evidence and claimed to be uncontroverted.
The plaintiffs, who became stockholders of the defendant corporation in 1937, contend that the facts before the court on this motion entitle them to the relief demanded in the complaint. They urge that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment should *32be denied in all respects and that judgment for an accounting and an injunction should be awarded to the plaintiffs.
It is clear that if any material issue of fact is raised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Potter v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Cwerdinski v. BentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Cohen v. AyersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Zwerdling ex rel. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. BentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Scott v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Lyon v. HoltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.