Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Slagle

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided October 24, 1994No. 12-94-00240-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILL BASS, Justice.

This original mandamus proceeding arises out of an election dispute. Relator, the Republican Candidate for Senate District 3,1 complains that Respondent Bob Slagle’s (“Slagle”) violated a ministerial duty by entering an Administrative Declaration of Ineligibility (“Declaration”) disqualifying Senator Bill Haley as a Democratic Candidate for the Texas State Senate in District 3. Following entry of this Declaration, the Democratic Party nominated Curtis Soileau (“Soileau”) to replace Senator Haley on the ballot. The Secretary of State thereafter accepted the Democratic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wentworth v. Meyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
  4. McClelland v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Parker v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Democratic Party v. BenkiserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Escobar v. Sutherland, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
  3. Nixon v. Slagle, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994
  4. State v. David B. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API