Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Schiffer v. United Grocers, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1999No. CC 94-2411-L-2; CA A87467; SC S43670Published

1ConcurrenceDurham, J.

I agree with the court’s disposition. I write separately to comment on the discussion of the premises for reconsideration of common-law rules expressed in G.L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc., 306 Or 54, 59, 757 P2d 1347 (1988).

In G.L., the plaintiff asked this court to impose liability on a hospital, without proof of negligence, for an employee’s criminal assault against the plaintiff, who was a *102hospital patient. The employee was acting outside the scope of employment at the time of the assault. Because the parties had framed their arguments in terms of the competing policies supporting…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Noonan v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1938

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API