Stretch v. Talmadge

This was an action for the dissolution of a partnership, and settlement of the partnership accounts.

Existence of the alleged partnership was denied. But the court found that in the year 1876 plaintiff and defendant entered into a partnership to manufacture and sell bricks, the profits and *511loss of which were to be divided equally between them; that under the articles of partnership there was manufactured, between the months of March and September, 1876, two kilns of brick, and these constituted the entire partnership property. The first kiln was sold entire, and the second from time to time in…