Legal Opinion
Spicer v. City of Camarillo
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 2011No. B228357PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
A local ordinance limits parking times on city streets. On those streets where posted signs limit the parking times, the Vehicle Code permits disabled persons displaying a placard to park an unlimited time. On streets where no such signs are posted, may disabled persons park an unlimited time? We conclude they may not because no statute permits such unlimited parking.
Thomas O. Spicer appeals a judgment entered following a court trial. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The City of Camarillo (City) has a long-standing ordinance, Camarillo Municipal Code section…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Stanley v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Occupy Fresno v. County of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Bishop v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- Garcia v. Mercedes-Benz USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Garcia v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Garcia v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.