Schoenrock v. Eib
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P. J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the conduct of the defendant, Eib, in mingling with members of the jury during recesses of court requires a new trial. The trial court denied a motion for a new trial and plaintiff has appealed.'
The facts are as follows: Plaintiff brought this action against the defendants Eib and Thompson to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband. The jury returned a verdict in her favor against Thompson, but denied her a verdict against Eib. The record before us relates only to the conduct of Eib in mingling with the jury. There is no…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BalfanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fischer v. KnappNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Colosimo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Jones v. BennettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Fischer v. KnappNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Harry Barfield Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.