Legal Opinion
Chinitz v. Intero Real Estate Services
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 12, 2021No. 5:18-cv-05623Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 RONALD CHINITZ, Case No. 18-cv-05623-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 10 INTERO REAL ESTATE SERVICES, JUDGMENT; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 11 Defendant. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 [Re: ECF 157 and 159] 13 14 This is a class action brought by Plaintiff Ronald Chinitz1 against Defendant Intero Real 15 Estate Services for allegedly making unlawful calls to residential telephone lines in violation of 16 the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.