Legal Opinion

Harmer v. Hulsey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1983No. 1353PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in holding his counterclaim barred by the statute of limitations. We find this contention without merit and, accordingly, affirm the lower court’s order.

On August 24, 1981, appellee instituted suit against appellant to recover for injuries received in a September 21, 1979 motor vehicle accident. Appellant was served with the complaint on September 8, 1981. On September 30, appellant filed an answer and a counterclaim alleging damages resulting from his own injuries sustained in the accident. Appellee replied, asserting in new matter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Household Consumer Discount Co. v. VespazianiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Woodland Oil Co. v. A. M. Byers & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Stulz v. BoswellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Gumienik v. LundDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ackler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Frankentek Residential Systems, LLC v. BuergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Chandler v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Bednar v. BednarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Murray v. MANSHEIMSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API