Legal Opinion

Board of Zoning Adj., Fultondale v. Summers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 7, 2001No. 1992284PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

This case concerns the propriety of the circuit court's grant of a variance in a zoning matter. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and render a judgment for the Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Fultondale ("the Board").

Facts and Procedural History

Robert B. Summers ("Summers") is the owner of a 2.08-acre parcel of land in the City of Fultondale. Summers purchased the property approximately 18 years before the present litigation. For approximately…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. GrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Brackett v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Ex Parte ChapmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. City of Mobile v. SorrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. BD. OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BIRMINGHAMCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. Peterson v. City of AbbevilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Town of Orrville v. S & H Mobile Homes, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Brown v. JeffersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  5. State v. PressleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API