Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomas Fuller v. William McCormick

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 10, 2017No. A16A1521; A16A1522Published

1DissentMcFADDEN, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent because this is not a case where the defense of assumption of the risk is susceptible of summary adjudication. And Thomas Fuller’s alternate arguments for summary judgment lack merit. So I would affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

1. Assumption of the risk.

An assumption of risk defense

is not ordinarily susceptible of summary adjudication, and summary judgment is appropriate only where the evidence is plain, palpable, and indisputable. In Georgia, a defendant asserting an assumption of the risk defense must establish that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Cowart v. WidenerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Vaughn v. PleasentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Trustees of Trinity College v. FerrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Elsberry v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API