Legal Opinion
Grassia v. PIERS
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 3, 2010No. Civil Action 07-11483-NMGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Grassia (“Grassia”) brought suit against defendants Theodore Piers (“Piers”), William Delaney (“Delaney”), alleged supervisor John Doe (“Doe”) and the Town of Framingham, Massachusetts (“the Town”) pursuant to the federal civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violations of the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, U.S. Const., amends. IV, V, XIV, and conspiracy to violate the same. He also brings claims against the Town for supervisory and vicarious liability and against the individual defendants pursuant to various state law…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mercurio v. Town of SherbornDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Clapp v. TobinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Mercurio v. Town of SherbornDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017