Legal Opinion

Taccino v. City of Cumberland, MD. Local Government

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 28, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00226Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CAROL TACCINO, et al., * Plaintiffs, * v. * Civil Action No. GLR-22-226 DAWN LINDSEY, et al., * Defendants. * *** MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiffs Carol and William Taccino’s Complaint and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF Nos. 1, 2). The Motion is ripe for disposition and no hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md. 2021). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the Motion but will otherwise dismiss the Complaint. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background On…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API