Conklin v. Ogborn
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Wayne Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
Ogborn and Hart sued William H. Conklin and Isaac N. Gaston, upon two promissory notes, and for goods sold and delivered. The notes are as follows:
“ $132 80. Cincinnati, April 17, 1854. Ninety days after date, we promise to pay to the order of W. E. Ogborn Sf Co., one hundred and thirty-two dollars and eighty cents, for value received. Conklin 8f Gaston.” .
“ $131 97. Cincinnati, May 16, 1854. Ninety days after date, we promise to pay to the order of W. E. Ogborn Sf Co., one hundred and thirty-one dollars and ninety-seven cents, for value received. Conklin Sf Gaston.” Under the charge for…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lockwood v. ComstockU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1848
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fetrow v. WisemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Clark v. VanCourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Catlin v. HaddoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Heady v. BodenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892