Legal Opinion

Royer v. Adams

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 20, 1981No. 80-490PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether a plaintiff, who prevailed on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim in State court, may recover attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 when he filed a motion for fees approximately two months after the trial court entered its final decree. We hold that attorney’s fees are recoverable and reverse the Trial Court (Batchelder, J.).

On October 9, 1974, the plaintiff filed a “Bill in Equity and Petition for Declaratory Relief” in the Hillsborough County Superior Court. He claimed that the department of employment security’s practice of terminating unemployment compensation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bonilla v. ChardónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  2. Chasan v. Village Dist. of EastmanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
  3. Filipino Accountants' Ass'n v. State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Kristensen v. StrindenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Scheele v. Village District of EidelweissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API