Legal Opinion
State v. Roma
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 25, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
143 N.J. Super. 504 (1976)
363 A.2d 923
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THOMAS ROMA, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal).
Decided May 25, 1976.
Messrs. Shanley & Fisher, attorneys for Roland Reed, Ph.D. (Mr. Richard A. Levao appearing).
Messrs. Farber, Hughes & Krause, attorneys for defendant (Mr. John J. Hughes appearing).
Messrs. McElroy, Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys for the American Association of Marriage and Family Counsellors and the New Jersey Association of Marriage and Family Counsellors, amicus curiae (Mr. Kevin J. Coakley appearing).
Mr. James T.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Myron FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Gerson v. GersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Ziemann v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Mays v. PenzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981