Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. Union Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 31, 1928No. 11,996PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Suit to quiet title, brought by Goodrich and Shipp, against Union Oil Company, et al. Decree quieting title in defendants. Plaintiffs bring error. We refer to them as designated at the trial. After the cause was docketed in this court, certain defendants have moved to dismiss for want of jurisdiction on the ground that other defendants at the trial, whose interests are not severable, were not made parties to the cause on error, and not named in nor served with the scire facias.

Clement Z. Goodrich, one of the plaintiffs, homesteaded the land, and United States patent was issued to him under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Montana Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Quimby v. BoydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  4. Mountain States Beet Growers Marketing Ass'n v. MonroeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Michigan Home Colony Co. v. TaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilder v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. County Commissioners v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. School District No. Six in County of Weld v. RussellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. Fastenau v. EngelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  5. King v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API