Legal Opinion

Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 3, 1902PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. May 20, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

This was an action upon a policy of life-insurance. Among other stipulations embraced therein were the follow*193ing: “ This contract shall not take effect until this policy is delivered to the member in person, during his lifetime and while in good health, nor until the first payment is paid in cash hereon, while said member is also in good health. No contract, alteration, or discharge of contracts, waivers or forfeitures, nor granting of permits or credits shall be valid, unless the same shall be in writing, signed by the president or vice-president, and one other officer of the association.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Jones v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Reliance Life Insurance v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Atlanta Buggy Co. v. Hess Spring & Axle Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Neal v. CraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Saddler v. Cotton States Life & Health InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Volunteer State Life Insurance v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API