Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Chronister

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 2, 2004No. 100,016PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Judge:

¶ 1 Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. (Employer) seeks review of an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court which modified and affirmed a trial judge’s order. The order, as modified, awarded Claimant Christopher Chronister temporary total disability benefits and resolved other disputes between the parties concerning home health care reimbursement and medical apparatus. We vacate the portion of the order relating to home health care reimbursement because the present record contains no competent evidence to support the order. In all other material respects,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pickens-Bond Construction Co. v. CaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Kushay v. Sexton Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Snyder v. Smith Welding & FabricationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Spiker v. John Day Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Warren Trucking Co., Inc. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Johnson Controls/York International v. KizerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API