Nelson v. Battle Forest Friends Meeting
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentJustice Meyer
I dissent.
The presumption set forth in the pertinent statute is that
[w]henever a railroad abandons a railroad easement, all right, title and interest in the strip, piece or parcel of land constituting the abandoned easement shall be presumed to be vested in those persons, firms or corporations owning lots or parcels of land adjacent to the abandoned easement, with the presumptive ownership of each adjacent landowner extending to the centerline of the abandoned easement. In cases where the railroad easement adjoins a public road right-of-way, the adjacent property owner’s right, title and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Matter of ArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.