Legal Opinion

United States v. Hathaway

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided August 29, 1977No. SPCM 12623PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DRIBBEN, Judge:

Appellant, contrary to his plea, was convicted of larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 921.

During the post-trial interview, appellant indicated that he “felt that his defense counsel did not have ‘confidence’ in him and was not adequately prepared for trial.” Despite appellant’s evinced dissatisfaction with his trial defense counsel, the latter was served with the record of trial and the staff judge advocate’s post-trial review, with the opportunity to comment thereon. United States v. Goode, 23…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RoganU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. StithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. JeterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API