Brampton Woolen Co. v. Local Union 112
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The court has jurisdiction to determine whether the dispute is arbitrable. Matter of Belding Hemingway Company, 295 N. Y. 541; International Association of Machinists & a. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc., 74 N. E. (2d.) 464. See also, Burleigh v. Ford, 59 N. H. 536, 539. Furthermore the plaintiff’s legal remedy is clearly inadequate and the demurrer was properly overruled. It was faced with a choice of refusing to arbitrate and thereby perhaps breaking the contract which would have freed the defendants from their no-strike obligation, or by participating in arbitration it might have been held to have…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re the Arbitration Between Belding Heminway Co. & Wholesale & Warehouse Workers' Union, Local 65, C.I.O.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by13 opinions
- J. Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- School District 42 v. MurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- University System of New Hampshire Board of Trustees & A. v. Marco Dorfsman & ASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Conlon-Moore Corp. v. CumminsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Conlon-Moore Corp. v. JohnstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.