Legal Opinion

California Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Pauly

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1896No. L. A. No. 66PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an ■ order refusing a new trial. George Puterbaugh, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

Action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the -San Diego Cable Railway Company (a corporation), to the plaintiff, in trust, to secure the payment of a series of bonds executed by the mortgagor. Before the commencement of the action, the said railway company had been adjudged an insolvent debtor, pursuant to the Insolvent Act of 1880, and all its estate, real and personal, had been duly assigned to the defendant, Pauly, who was the duly elected and qualified assignee of the estate of said insolvent debtor.

The plaintiff prevailed in the lower court; and the defendant, Pauly,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Samuel D. Harris and Others v. Jesse D. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  4. Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Towle v. Carmelo Land & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FitzwaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Higgins v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Brown v. Lehigh Valley RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In re Los Angeles Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API