Legal Opinion

Naugle v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1981No. Appeal, No. 2919 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

In this workmen’s compensation appeal, the claimant1 questions a denial of compensation by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, affirming the referee’s decision that the claimant was not injured in the course of his employment.2

*134An employee of the Penn Machine Company (employer), the claimant was injured on February 23, 1979 when he slipped on ice, fell and broke his hip while walking to the plant after parking his car. The lot where the claimant was injured, located across a set of railroad tracks from the employer’s property, was owned by U.S. Steel; the claimant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Fashion Hosiery Shops v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Interstate United Corp. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Schofield v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Artrip v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tatrai v. Presbyterian University HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Cochran v. FeekoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Tatrai v. Presbyterian University HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API