Legal Opinion
Cochran v. Feeko
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 18, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89-8664Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Defendant seeks summary judgment against plaintiff on the ground that plaintiff’s negligence cause of action alleged in his complaint falls within the purview of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act. For the reasons stated below, I grant defendant’s motion.
I
Summary judgment is appropriate if there exists no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Small v. Seldows Stationery, 617 F.2d 992, 994 (3d Cir.1980). The court does not resolve questions of disputed fact, but simply decides whether…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Sidney P. Small and William Landesman, D/B/A Small & Landesman v. Seldows Stationery, Jack Belowitz, Irving Platt and Irwin KatzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Ettinger v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.