Willett v. Kesselring
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckinridge, Judge. Action by E. D. Kesselring against Mary L. Willett for unlawfully detaining premises leased by plaintiff to defendant. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
E. D. Kesselring, defendant in error, subleased to Mrs. Mary L. Willett, plaintiff in error, the house and premises in question, and they entered into a written agreement by which Mrs. Willett agreed to pay a stipulated rental and, furthermore, “that she will pay all taxes and assessments that shall be levied upon said premises during the term”, and should she default in the payment of the rent or taxes, then Kessel- ring was authorized to re-enter into and upon the premises and repossess the same. Kesselring instituted this suit, which is an action for unlawful detainer, before a justice of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Snyder v. StriblingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bertrand v. ApplebySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Lindley v. SaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Lucky Thirteen Oil Syndicate v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932