Legal Opinion

Deutsch, Larrimore & Farnish, P.C. v. Joyce & William Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 2004No. 26 EAP 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

848 A.2d 137 (2004)

DEUTSCH, LARRIMORE & FARNISH, P.C., Appellant,

v.

Joyce & William JOHNSON and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc., Appellees.

Ruth S. Libros, Intervenor.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 20, 2003.

Decided April 29, 2004.

Dale G. Larrimore, Esq., Thomas S. Farnish, Esq., for Deutsch, Larrimore & Farnish, P.C.

Alan Gershenson, Esq., for Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc.

Joyce and William Johnson, for Joyce and William Johnson, pro se.

Joshua Sarner, Esq., Leonard Sarner, Esq., for Ruth S. Libros.

Before: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, and LAMB, JJ.

OPINI…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Blanchette v. BlanchetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Paulsen v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Overbrook Heights Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Ingels EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API