Legal Opinion

Barnett Bank of Tampa v. Pitts (In Re Pitts)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 20, 1981No. Bankruptcy 80-1412PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

THIS IS a contested discharge proceeding and the matter under consideration is the dischargeability of a debt admittedly due and owing by William Edward Pitts (Pitts) to Barnett Bank of Tampa (Barnett), the Plaintiff who instituted this adversary proceeding.

The claim of non-dischargeability is based on § 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and it is contended by the Plaintiff that the debt represents a liability created by false pretenses, and as such is outside of the overall protective provisions of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re BlackDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Mobile D/B/A Bankamericard/visa v. Harold Eugene Roddenberry and Jayne Hettie RoddenberryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. Volk of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Gelfand (In Re Gelfand)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Strawbridge & Clothier v. Caivarelli (In Re Ciavarelli)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. of Pa. v. Lipsey (In Re Lipsey)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Matter of BufordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API