Legal Opinion
Goldblum v. Harden
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 7, 1966No. 2246PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASEZ, Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the grounds that the issues are moot and that the defendant-appellant has acquiesced in the judgment. Plaintiff leased defendant certain premises at the rate of $750 a month for a period of five years, from October 1, 1963 to September 20, 1968. The lease provided, inter alia:
“At the expiration of this lease, or its termination for other causes, Lessee is obligated to immediately surrender possession, and should Lessee fail to do so, he consents to pay any and all damages, but in no case less than five times the rent per day, with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jefferson v. GammSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- People's Bank v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Meyer v. McClellanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- City of New Orleans v. FolkmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- New Orleans Hat Attack, Inc. v. New York Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Smith v. ShirleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Goldblum v. HardenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Herman v. Style Line Greetings, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Herman v. Style Line Greetings, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.