Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mrs. London's Bake Shop, Ltd. v. City of Saratoga Springs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1988Published

1DissentWeiss, J.

As the majority recognizes, plaintiff’s *751efforts in avoiding disclosure can readily be classified as willful and in bad faith. In our view, Supreme Court’s responsive preclusion order was a proper exercise of its broad discretion under CPLR 3126 (see, Zletz v Wetanson, 67 NY2d 711; Crowley v Montefiore Hosp. & Med. Center, 128 AD2d 443, 444). Nor, under the described circumstances, are we inclined to exercise our inherent discretion to excuse plaintiff’s transgressions (cf., Whitbeck v Erin’s Isle, 109 AD2d 1032, 1034). An affirmance is appropriate.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zletz v. WetansonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Whitbeck v. Erin's Isle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Crowley v. Montefiore Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987